fbpx

Betrayal in the CD 4 Council Race: One Person’s Opinion

GUEST WORDS-In the Western Classic, One Eyed Jacks (1961) starring Marlon Brando and Karl Malden one line really jumped off the screen and has stuck with me over the years. Early in the movie Karl Malden’s character (Dad) betrays Marlon Brando’s character (Rio) resulting in hard time in a Mexican prison for Brando and riches for Malden. After 5 years Brando escapes and goes after Malden who had used his riches to become sheriff of Monterey California. 

In the twists and turns that follow a violent confrontation takes place between Brando and Malden. Malden uses his position as sheriff to frame Brando and have him locked up. Knowing that the trial's outcome is certain, and Brando’s character is sure to be hanged in two days, Malden has one last private talk with him, again attempting to excuse his earlier betrayal to which Brando replies, "You may be a one-eyed jack around here, but I’ve seen the other side of your face." This line to me encapsulated the age old story of betrayal. 

In real life betrayal is rarely that clear cut or dramatic but sometimes it’s close. What follows is my reflection as the Author of the Transparency Pledge signed by 12 of the CD 4 candidates. 

On Monday, March 16th a whole bunch of us trooped down to City Hall for a hearing on the Academy Museum and Event Center project (Fairfax and Wilshire). This project has caused great concern in the community and we were there to make sure our voices were heard. 

To the great dismay of members of the Miracle Mile Residential Association (MMRA) who were in attendance, Carolyn Ramsay arrived and promptly set about expounding on how wonderful the project would be and completely cut the legs out from under all the neighbors who had just testified.  

It was like we had not been there, that we were invisible. She stated among things that “the Miracle Mile went from kind of a -- there were tumbleweeds blowing down Wilshire 20 years ago. There was nothing happening. And now it has really blossomed.” Yes she said Tumbleweeds? You can’t make this stuff up. 

She also said she was happy to see that the Academy was working so closely with the neighborhood.  Now maybe she meant the business or film buffs from all over LA County that showed up to testify because she could not have been talking about those of us who live within a few blocks of the project. 

She closed with it is important that the Academy listen carefully to the community and that they've done this so far. Again I’m not sure what community she is talking about. 

Carolyn’s cheerleading for the Academy Museum and Event Center was just after the Vice President of the MMRA and I had described our fears about traffic, neighborhood intrusion, parking issues, the sign district, and other infrastructure problems. Representatives of Carthay Circle Homeowners and Beverly Wilshire Homes also had voiced similar concerns. Words like fearful, strikes fear, terrified, peppered the testimony from those living closet to the project. 

Yet, Carolyn didn’t offer the slightest acknowledgement of the community’s concerns as she gushed over the Academy Museum and Event Center at the hearing. It was clear that she had given no consideration to the residents most impacted by this project. Her blind endorsement of the project could only be explained in one of several ways: either she is oblivious to the issues voiced by the community, or she will support big development no matter what the consequences to the neighborhood. 

I have known Carolyn for a long time and never in my wildest imagination did I suspect she would so completely turn her back on the community. I had just witnessed another side of Carolyn Ramsay. (Photo) 

Given that Carolyn is presenting herself as a champion for our neighborhoods and as the candidate who will work for neighborhoods and hold City hall accountable,  I found her assessment of the Academy Museum and Event Center project beyond flawed.     

But this was one of the reasons why I developed the Candidate Transparency Pledge. I wanted a document that spelled out how they would go about making decision on land use matters and more. I wanted to be able to hold their feet to the fire and in my opinion, as its author she had just violated the pledge.  She signed a document saying (among things) that she would base her decisions on policies as outlined in the General Plan, and require that the City officially document and demonstrate that there is sufficient infrastructure to support new development. 

We all know what is happening with Infrastructure in the City. Some of it is visible like streets, sidewalks, untrimmed trees while some like water and sewer pipes, as well as aging power systems are not. 

New development requires all kinds of infrastructure to support its use. Some issues like our water supply scream from the headlines every day and we know we have to make do with less, not more.

So the pledge was to ensure that new development not overburden the infrastructure for the residents and businesses in the neighborhoods. 

{module [1177]}

Maybe Carolyn believes that because she isn’t elected the pledge doesn’t count. Well in my world you either protect neighborhoods because it is the right thing to do or you do not! 

If Carolyn could be so cavalier about a project with such serious impacts to the neighborhood how could we ever trust her to advocate for us on anything? I have concluded I for one can’t. Carolyn can get all the endorsements in the world saying she is a protector of neighborhoods but actions speak much louder than words. Unfortunately her action at the hearing demonstrated that she is business as usual. 

On the way back from the hearing I was asked why I thought she did it, why she showed up to speak about a project that has the potential to be catastrophic to the neighborhoods surrounding it?  I could only answer that I believed it was a command performance, one she felt she could not ignore. What a shame.  

The Miracle Mile is not the only neighborhood with huge projects on the drawing board. Sherman Oaks has the (Sunkist Building Expansion), Hollywood the (8150 Sunset Blvd), Windsor Square/Hancock Park (CIM Group Park Mile Specific Plan project), and those are just a few off the top of my head. All require sufficient infrastructure including public safety and mitigation against traffic intrusion into their neighborhoods. 

All of us need and deserve more than business as usual!

 

(Jim O’Sullivan is president of the Miracle Mile Residential Association and is one of the founders of fixthecity.org.) 

-cw

  

CityWatch

Vol 13 Issue 31

Pub: Apr 14, 2015