GUEST WORDS - As the Supreme Court considers two cases that could lead to unprecedented rulings on the right to marriage equality, I’ve been paying close attention. For me, the national conversation about this civil right hits especially close to home because I’m the daughter of two strong and courageous women.
People always ask what it’s like growing up with two moms, and I always answer the same way. Instantly defensive, I say that growing up with two moms isn’t different at all. I was lucky to have two loving parents and their parenting — not their gender — is what made the biggest difference in my upbringing.
And I mean it. But the truth is, it’s also different — the differences are just harder to talk about. Having two moms means that people question my sexuality and my brother’s sexuality. It means that people question the way I was raised. It means that people feel justified in openly discussing their opinions about my personal life. It means having to consciously decide in every new group whether to cautiously mention “my moms” or to safely and cowardly stick with “my parents.” It means hiding part of my identity.
And it strains my family’s finances.
Since the Supreme Court announced it would take the case of 83-year-old Edith Windsor, who is challenging the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), I’ve finally begun to hope that the right to marry will soon be guaranteed across the nation.
Edie Windsor was saddled with a federal estate tax bill of $363,000 when her partner of 40 years, Thea Spyer, passed away. This kind of injustice is all too familiar to me, since my family also pays what we call the “gay tax.”
This tax is a combination of unfair expenses that same-sex couples face as a result of discriminatory laws. We pay thousands of extra dollars each year so one of my moms can be covered by the other’s health insurance plan. If they were married, it would be free.
For my family, estate taxes have also been a concern. Since these taxes have changed many times in recent years and may continue to change significantly in the future, my family had to buy extra life insurance to ensure we could afford the tax imposed on us from the ownership transfer of our apartment if something were to happen to one of my moms. If my parents were married, it would be inherited with no taxes at all.
Under DOMA, marriages like my moms’ union don’t count for federal purposes. Like a string of state laws along the lines of California’s Proposition 8, which prevents same-sex couples from getting married, this legislation does real harm to our families, friends, and neighbors.
Legal advocates sometimes point to unfair taxation to explain why DOMA is unconstitutional, but the problem goes beyond monetary inequality. The law has to go, not just because of the extra expense, but because of the bigger message it sends. It teaches that our country can devalue certain people while taxing them more. It teaches that same-sex families don’t count.
But our families do matter. And when all families can take care of each other, our communities are stronger.
We need to dump DOMA and overturn Prop 8. Such discrimination and misinformation is harmful not only to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender families, but to all families.
The national dialogue about marriage equality hits more than “close” to home, it is about my home — and the homes and families of Americans across the country just like me.
(Sam Paltrow-Krulwich is a junior history major at Oberlin College. She is a Fellow with People For the American Way Foundation's Young People For (YP4) program. This column provided CityWatch by OtherWords.org)
-cw
CityWatch
Vol 11 Issue 28
Pub: Apr 5, 2013