Skip to main content

Why Angelenos Didn't Give a Damn about This Election

March 07 2013
Written by Mark Lacter.

LA OBSERVED - Even by LA standards, turnout was pathetic. Just 16 percent of registered voters cast ballots, one of the lowest showings ever recorded in Los Angeles. Guess all those mailers and TV ads didn't do the trick. 

Same with the 40-odd debates (aka The Sleeping Channel, which is coming soon to your local cable company). 

 

Actually, I feel kind of sorry for the folks running for mayor - they all meant well, and goodness knows, they've worked hard. But they're not exactly natural born leaders. Hell, let's just say it: They were the dullest, most unimaginative group of candidates I can ever recall following. 

They focused on platitudes instead of solutions. They burrowed into topics that Angelenos don't understand or care about. Structural deficits? Pension reform? The gross receipts tax? I follow this stuff all the time, and even I was bored by the patter. 

We should be honest with ourselves: The people of LA are a highly diverse, largely self-involved bunch and in the final analysis they have only three common interests: (Read more … including what LA’s common interests are … here.)

-cw

 

 

CityWatch

Vol 11 Issue 20

Pub: Mar 8, 2013

 

 

Get The News In Your Email Inbox Mondays & Thursdays


Featured CityWatch Stories

WESTSIDE - Currently larger than 40 states in terms of population with roughly 10 million residents, Los Angeles County…
PLANNING WATCH - Monday, September 7, 2026, was Labor Day, a holiday only celebrated in the United States and Canada as…
Yom Kippur demands more than personal repentance. At a defining moment for Jews everywhere, it asks whether we have tru…
MY VIEW - Quid pro quo: Latin for “this for that.” English for “bribe.” In Assemblymember Schiavo-speak: quid pro no—“N…
THE BOTTOM LINE - Los Angeles voters have heard the promises before: safer streets, cleaner neighborhoods, more housing…