CALIFORNIA IS A GAS TAX LEADER-Sacramento is about to launch a new attack in its ongoing war on drivers.
California’s 48.6 cent gas tax already ranks s econd out of 50 states –- the feds take another 18.4 cents — and when the hidden carbon tax, part of the cap-and-trade p rogram, is factored in, our state leads the pack by a wide margin. But this is not nearly enough, according to the political class.
Sen. Jim Beall is building a coalition of both Democrats and Republicans in the Legislature to hike gas taxes along with vehicle license fees and registration.
The San Jose lawmaker’s Senate Bill 16 slams taxpayers in three ways. First, it would raise at least $3 billion annually by increasing the gas tax by another 10 cents a gallon. Second, it would hike the vehicle license fee, which is based on value, by more than 50 percent over 5 years. Third, it would increase the cost to register a vehicle by over 80 percent.
Although the backers of the SB 16 tax increase say it is vital to make up the claimed $59 billion backlog in roadway maintenance, some of the funds are slated to go to repaying transportation bonds that, when passed, were to be paid from the general fund. This means that not all of the new revenue will go to the stated intent of fixing roads and highways.
Whatever the actual dollar amount of the backlog in roadway maintenance, this shortfall is the result of previous diversions of gas tax and truck weight revenue to budget items that have no direct impact on road improvement, and Beall’s bill would allow this practice to continue.
It should not go unnoticed that the $59 billion estimated backlog approaches the $68 billion that the governor and Legislature want to spend on the bullet train.
Quentin Kopp, former chairman of the California High-Speed Rail Authority, has become a strong critic, characterizing it as “low-speed rail” due to the changes that have been made to the original plan that voters were promised to convince them to provide seed money for the project in 2008.
He adds that to be financially viable, high-speed trains need to run from 10 to 20 trains per hour, but due to the current plan, called a “blended system,” slower trains and bullet trains must share the same track, reducing the number of fast trains to about four per hour.
And even supporters of the project as currently envisioned concede that the Los Angeles to San Francisco trip that voters were told would take about two-hours and forty minutes for a $50 fare, will likely take closer to 5 hours at nearly double the cost to the rider.
So, while Sacramento politicians and special interest insiders, including unions and construction companies, continue to push for billions of dollars of new spending on a high-speed rail system that is not expected to be completed before 2029, they expect drivers, fed up with bumping along on crumbling roads and highways, to pay more.
Gas prices in California are already tops in the nation. If taxes are increased again, every motorist should be given a railroad engineer’s cap compliments of Sacramento lawmakers and the governor because the extra they pay will free up money, which could have been used for roads, to be spent on their pet train.
(Jon Coupal is president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association — California’s largest grass-roots taxpayer organization dedicated to the protection of Proposition 13 and the advancement of taxpayers’ rights.
●●●
Dissing the High-Speed Rail Isn’t Getting You Any Votes in Fantasyland
Albert Perdon
Albert Perdon · University of Southern California
COUNTERPOINT-I don’t expect a reply or that you will agree with my point of view on the “Pain at the Pump” article. But consider this. Dissing the high-speed train project is not getting you any votes in Fantasyland or in any of the haunts that you are trying to influence.
Why not try coming up with a solution that works for you and the people you haven’t been able to convince? California could profit greatly from a high-speed train system that makes economic sense and that would enjoy the support of the people you abhor.
You need to open your mind and realize that more or less tax is not the most important issue.
The issue is growing the economy.
It’s growing the population.
It’s gaining greater value.
You focus on cutting taxes on a sinking ship. Why not raise taxes on a state that can afford to?
Millions of people are looking for housing. Millions of commuters are looking for a way to move about faster and at lower cost. The needs are limitless.
Advocate for getting things done and show us how to do it. Cool the rhetoric on the repetitious same old, same old arguments that carry no water. Don’t forget, were in a drought.
(Albert H. Perdon is a Civil Engineer and Consultant. This discussion was posted earlier at Fox and Hounds)
-cw
CityWatch
Vol 13 Issue 47
Pub: June 9, 2015
