- Written by Ken Alpern
08 Jul 2011
Historically, the “building or fixing the roads” phrase extends from ancient Roman times and survives to this modern day, probably because with roads come commerce, and with commerce comes the ability of people to economically thrive and enjoy an enhanced quality of life (either through enhanced mobility or greater access to a wider variety of goods).
Also historically, the phrase was premised on the concept of self-reliance—if you didn’t labor, produce or trade, you didn’t eat or live too well. Unfortunately, we currently endure a nanny state that caters to corporate, military/industrial, education, union and/or other elites, as well as a variety of ne’er-do-well types that have to be “fed” before the vital functions of government (such as the assurance and enhancement of commerce) can be establish by “building or fixing the roads”.
In today’s urban reality, the need for transportation lies well beyond “the roads” and includes rail, air travel and even pedestrian and bicycle-oriented transportation options that ensure and enhance commerce. Furthermore, the ability to “cyber-commute” (which is often forgotten as one of the most efficient, pleasant and environmentally-friendly methods of communication, shopping or employment) is also a growing and changing alternative to confront.
A sober but unavoidable truism that gets forgotten in the ridiculous wars surrounding transportation funding and prioritization is that NONE of the aforementioned methods of travel pay directly for themselves. Whether it’s a fee, government subsidization or private funding, ALL of these transportation options require money to build and also to operate.
Cars need gas, insurance and maintenance. So do trains and planes. Roads and rail lines need large amounts of money for construction and operation, as do airports, cell towers, power lines and wireless networks.
However, they virtually and decidedly ALL pay for themselves indirectly through the commerce and powered economy engendered through transportation and related infrastructure projects. Yes, there are roads to nowhere, airports to nowhere, rail lines to nowhere, bridges to nowhere, etc., but by and large the well-conceived projects pay for themselves a lot sooner than most skeptics realize.
Which is why one of our greatest current economic challenges is the perilous and narrow strait we must navigate with respect to appropriate transportation funding. We have to confront the careful and narrow path between the Scylla and Charybdis of both political parties, and between the extreme left and extreme right who continuously and repeatedly thwart the common sense and well-being of the average American.
Which is why the GOP appears so cruel and heartless when it opposes virtually all transportation spending as “pork”, and which is why the Democrats appear so naïve and fiscally-irresponsible when it prioritizes transportation behind (as opposed to being in front of) other, less defined and less meritorious priorities.
Which is also why many Americans probably agree with President Obama when he believes that House Majority Leader Boehner will (or at least should) see the light with respect to the House passing a right-sized transportation/infrastructure bill.
And which is also why many Americans probably agree with Republican House Representative Bobby Schilling of Illinois when he believes that—despite being critical of the stimulus law enacted before he was elected—more of the money should have been devoted to infrastructure projects. [link]
As with the voter-approved bonds in Sacramento from the Schwarzeneggar era, the stimulus package enacted the year after President Obama took office was sold as transportation/infrastructure (T/I)…but had a lot of unproven, more fiscally-nebulous OTHER priorities that left T/I as a relatively small minority fraction of what would otherwise have been a more voter-accepted and economy-rebuilding effort had the money been spent for what it was advertised.
Education, affordable housing, union money grabs, social services and a variety of other priorities got in the way of the barebones, economy-focused T/I packages in both Sacramento and Washington, and if anyone complained he/she was decried as hating teachers, students, poor people, minorities, the disabled, puppies, bunnies, flowers and just about anyone or anything else that could be trotted out as needy and in need of support.
Except that with an economy in the doldrums, the essentials have to be prioritized—something which both political parties have a problem with as they forget how the national rail and interstate highway systems have been the primary factors for the world power America became over the past two centuries. These rail and highways systems are responsible for the economy that pays for all of the other governmental priorities that have now superseded the T/I core priority they've always relied upon.
Perhaps the GOP and the Democrats in Washington can rededicate the remaining, unspent stimulus funds to the T/I funding bill being debated in the House, and tell other priorities’ lobbyists that they won’t really help our economy, and that a haircut is needed for everyone in government—but not with the T/I priority always taking the biggest hit.
We need more transportation funding (provided that it’s properly vetted and spent well, as we're seeing in LA County through its recently-passed Measure R), and we need education, military and entitlement programs to really have their bloated budgets be right-sized and spent more cost-effectively
What worked for the Romans two thousand years ago still works today for the average American: we want the government to just build and fix the damn roads (or rail, or what have you)…and we can take care of ourselves from there.
Tags: political party, infrastructure, Romans, GOP, building and fixing roads
Vol 9 Issue 54
Pub: July 8, 2011